University of Hartford
(B.Mus.Ed., 1983)
Trenton State College
(M.A., 1988)
Rutgers-Camden School of Law
(J.D., 1991)
About
Professional Backgound
Mr. Torchia has been a managing member of the firm since 2000. His practice is concentrated in commercial litigation with a strong emphasis on employment law. He routinely represents and counsels local, regional, national and international businesses of all sizes in state and federal courts throughout the country on a variety of litigation matters. When he first joined the firm in 1995, he established an employment law department which has expanded to include representative clients such as national manufacturers, health care providers and pharmaceutical companies, large contractors, financing institutions and a multitude of non-profit and for-profit small and mid-size businesses.
He is a sought-after lecturer in programs that advise and train attorneys and human resources personnel, speaks extensively on employment law and litigation topics and is often asked to present in-house training and seminars for clients. He is a regular presenter for PBI, a course planner for its annual Employment Law Institute and since 2018 has presented the opening plenary session “Year in Review.” He is the former Chair of the Montgomery Bar Association’s Employment and Labor Law Committee
Mr. Torchia’s personal style of becoming intimately familiar with the client and the client’s goals and objectives has allowed him to accurately provide preventative strategies and advice in crisis situations, and it is those qualities that have attracted and maintained his loyal client base. Clients generally are drawn to two of Mr. Torchia’s opposing characteristics, that is, his easy-going style with clients versus his tenacious style in the courtroom and with the opposition.
Mr. Torchia enjoys an AV Rating from Martindale-Hubbell; has been recognized as a Preeminent Lawyer in the fields of litigation and employment law each year since 2002; and was chosen every year since 2009 as a “Super Lawyer” in the area of Employment Law. Consistently for the past several years, he has been named to the Philadelphia Top 100 Super Lawyers list, which recognizes the top 100 attorneys ranked in the nomination and research process. In addition, Mr. Torchia is very involved in community activities, backpacking, skiing, the Red Sox, his son’s professional acting career, and is a Chancellor Emeritus of his law school alumni association.
Independent Workplace Investigator
Mr. Torchia is a well-known workplace investigator, and is routinely hired by other attorneys and corporate executives to investigate a wide variety of workplace misconduct. Mr. Torchia also serves as an expert witness for workplace investigations, and has developed programs and lectures on workplace investigations as well. He is the author of several publications regarding employment law including the Workplace Investigations chapter of the Pennsylvania Employment Law Deskbook published by PBI Press, and an in depth white paper about at-will employment in Pennsylvania.
Mr. Torchia conducts independent workplace investigations nationwide of claims of sexual harassment, discrimination, retaliation, wrongful discharge, defamation and employee malfeasance for both public and private employers. Various clients including large international corporations, public entities, governmental agencies and departments and closely held businesses. His experience includes:
Publications:
Selected Opinions
Albee v. Albee, U.S.D.C. for E.D. of Pa., No. 21-3984 (Feb. 14, 2024) (obtained $292,000 trial decision for client making claim as oppressed shareholder, and successfully defending counterclaims).
Rondabay Liggins-McCoy v. Democratic Caucus of the Senate of Pennsylvania, No. 22-3259 (3d Cir., Dec. 2023) (successfully obtain summary judgment in the federal district court, then affirmation from Third Circuit Court of Appeals against former staff employee suing the Caucus for wrongful termination due to her disability and age. First of its kind decision based on Eleventh Amendment immunity argument).
Retina Assoc. of Greater Phila., Ltd. v. Retinovitreous Assocs., Ltd., Mont. Cty. CCP, No. 09-32182. (successfully defended claim for over $11 million after six-day private arbitration).
Socko v. Mid-Atlantic Systems of CPA, Inc., 2014 Pa. Super. 103 (May 13, 2014) (allocator granted) (affirmed trial court that Uniform Written Obligations Act and “intending to be legally bound” language is insufficient to defeat requirement of additional valuable consideration for a non-competition provision offered to an employee after the start of employment); Socko v. Mid-Atlantic Systems of CPA, Inc., 126 A.3d 1266 (Pa. 2015) (Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirming Superior Court).
Accu-Fire Fabrication, Inc. v. S.S. Sprinkler Co., Inc. and Midlantic Fire, LLC, U.S.D.C. for the E.D. of Pa., Docket #2:11-cv-03367-JCJ (securing jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for unpaid goods and services, the jury finding successor liability and full damages requested).
Brandner v. Innovex, Inc., 2012-Ohio-462 (First District, Hamilton County, Ohio, Feb. 10, 2012) (securing summary judgment in favor of company and against plaintiff alleging various employment related claims, affirmed in appellate court).
Bioquell Inc. v. Feinstein, et al., Civ. No. 10–2205, 2011 WL 673746 (E.D. Pa., Feb. 16, 2011) (successfully defending company and two individuals against claims of violation of non-competition provision, breach of contract and related claims in preliminary injunction).
Griffin v. De Lage Landen Financial Serv. Inc., 219 Fed. Appx. 245, 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 233 (3d Cir. Pa., Mar. 13, 2007) (directed verdict granted at trial to dismiss claims of gender discrimination and retaliation affirmed).
Integrated Health Services, Inc. v. Lee, 281 B.R. 231 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002) (represented employer against two key executives; court upheld the former employee’s restrictive covenants and protected employer’s trade secrets).
Bailey v. United Airlines, 279 F.2d 194 (3d Cir. 2002) (represented age discrimination plaintiff in successful appeal to reverse the grant of summary judgment).
Spierling v. First American Home Health Care Services, Inc., 737 A.2d 1250 (Pa. Super. 1999) (represented defendant in successful appeal, Superior Court holding no violation of public policy for an employer to discharge an employee for reporting Medicare fraud absent a statutory duty to do so).
Armbruster v. Unisys Corp., 32 F.3d 768 (3d Cir. 1994) (represented group of 14 age discrimination plaintiffs in successful appeal to reverse the grant of summary judgment).
TV Interviews
“Coronavirus Concerns Leads to Big Questions for Local Businesses
Interview with NBC 10 News
March 10, 2020
Who is Eligible for Unemployment During the Coronavirus Shutdown?
Interview with NBC 10 News
March 17, 2020
Know Your Employee Rights Before Heading Back to Work During Coronavirus Pandemic
6 ABC Action News
May 12, 2020
Covid-19 Privacy Concerns in the Workplace
NBC 10 News
May 30, 2020
Are Workers Laid-off in Pandemic Entitled to Getting Their Jobs Back and Better Protections?
NBC 10 News
June 20, 2020
Articles by Michael J. Torchia, Esq.
Employee Handbooks and Checklist
Michael J. Torchia, Esq.
At-Will Employment and Wrongful Discharge in Pennsylvania
Michael J. Torchia, Esq. and Stephen C. Goldblum, Esq.
Conducting Workplace Investigations
Michael J. Torchia, Esq.
Who’s next? Is your company prepared to respond to claims of sexual harassment?
Smart Business Magazine: February, 2018
Individual liability: How executives and managers are vulnerable
Smart Business Magazine: March 2013
Smart Separation: How to implement a comprehensive employee separation agreement and release
Smart Business Magazine: May 2012
“Non-Competes Supported By ‘Intending To Be Legally Bound?”
September 14, 2012 as special contributor to The Legal Intelligencer






